I’m working away on the instructions for the first of our upcoming 5 patterns and am having some second thoughts on a design feature that I included in this garment. Is it truly functional and worth the effort necessary to sew it? Should I remove it entirely or just adjust it to a different style?
Now, I’d really like your advice on this but it is impossible to keep our pattern a surprise if I ask for your help! So I think I will remove the element of surprise for this particular design and I hope you don’t mind. I really valued your feedback when I asked for your thoughts on button-up shirts. All of your discussion on fit and design features led me to feel as though the Fairfield Button-up was designed by our menswear sewing community and not just by myself.
So let’s try this again!
We’ve created a pattern for men’s pyjama bottoms after receiving many requests over the years to design an easy garment suitable for new sewists. People are looking for a woven project that introduces sewists to the skills necessary to sew more advanced menswear on their next project.
Of course, there are many pyjama patterns out there already so I have carefully chosen design elements that make these pyjamas uniquely “Thread Theory.” They include all sorts of high end finishing details that will prepare someone to sew the Jedediah Pants or Jutland Pants for their next project. They have pocket facings so that the inseam pockets do not allow a peek of pocketing material to be visible when the leg is moved. They include a wide fold over waistband that encloses both elastic and a fabric or twill tape drawstring. Their side seams and inseams may be adorned with top stitching as an easy way to practice precision stitching to prepare for flat-fell seams on future projects.
The last design feature, which is the one I need your help on, is a fully functioning button fly. This fly adds an attractive amount of detail to the front of the pants and it also allows the wearer to go “though the barn door” when going to the washroom rather than pulling their PJs down. The last advantage of this fly is that it offers excellent practice for someone who hopes to progress to sewing trousers confidently.
Now that you know why I added this button fly, here are my concerns and my questions:
- I am considering doing a True Beginner and Confident Beginner variation. The True Beginner would skip the fly altogether and simply sew the entire crotch seam closed. Is a button fly too complicated for a Confident Beginner?
- I wonder if anyone would actually find a functioning fly useful on a pair of pyjamas with an elastic waist. They are a common feature on RTW pyjama pants but I am not certain all the work they add for a home sewer is worth your while…isn’t it easier for a man to undo the drawstring bow and pull his pants down instead of undo a button fly and taking the time to ‘fish around’? (Blushing…) If they really aren’t that useful, why do so many store bought pyjamas include this style of fly?
- I like the interest that the fly top stitching adds to the front of the garment and feel this same aesthetic could be achieved with an easy to sew mock-fly. Perhaps a mock-fly would be more in-line with a Confident Beginner’s capabilities. But I have read many comments from Thread Theory pattern users saying that do not like sewing garments that include non-functional design elements. Would you feel that a non-functional mock fly that has been included solely for aesthetics is “cheap” or somehow “cheating”? We want these pyjamas to feel luxuriously high end and would hate for a mock fly to detract from this!
So, to sum things up, which option do you prefer?
- Two variations: No fly and functioning button fly.
- Two variations: No fly and mock-fly.
- Two variations: Mock fly and functioning button fly.
- One variation: No fly – making this pattern very clear and straightforward for true beginners (sometimes variations can make the instruction booklet look overwhelming).
Thanks for your help!